USPTO serial 85183871
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Madison Chemical Industries Inc.
Milton, Ontario, CA
Madison Chemical Industries Inc.
Milton, Ontario, CA
Madison Chemical Industries Inc.
Milton, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A. SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BLVDSUITE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3360| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Water-based corrosion resistant protective polymer coatings for architectural applications excluding swimming pools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |