Drawing for DISPLAYFLIX

USPTO serial 85184363

DISPLAYFLIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISPLAYFLIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin M. Gold, Esquire

KEVIN M. GOLD, ESQUIRE RHOADS AND SINON LLP1 S MARKET SQ FL 12HARRISBURG, PA 17101-2141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound or images; computer and computer peripheral apparatus; computer software for creating and managing advertising materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 11, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 16, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance