Drawing for INNOVATIVE STANDARDS, INC.

USPTO serial 85184844

INNOVATIVE STANDARDS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INNOVATIVE STANDARDS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020BedsACTIVEFeb 10, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 20, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 17, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 31, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 31, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance