USPTO serial 85185490
SUBTEXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUBTEXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARLO F. VAN DEN BOSCH
CARLO F. VAN DEN BOSCH Sheppard Mullin650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, Fourth FloorCosta mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring clothing, namely, adult novelty gag clothing item, namely, socks, athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms, athletic shoes, baby tops, baseball caps and hats, beach shoes, belts, blazers, bomber jackets, booties, bottoms, bras, briefs, camouflage jackets, cardigans, clothing, namely, arm warmers, clothing, namely, hand-warmers, clothing, namely, khakis, clothing, namely, knee warmers, clothing, namely, wrap-arounds, coats for men and women, corsets, crop tops, dress pants, dress shirts, dresses, dressing gowns and bath robes, evening dresses, fleece vests, flip flops, footwear, footwear for men and women, footwear not for sports, fur hats, gift packages sold as a unit consisting primarily of a sweatshirt and also including a photo frame, a coffee mug, and a tote bag, gloves, gloves as clothing, gloves for apparel, gloves including those made of skin, hide or fur, halter tops, hats, hats for infants, babies, toddlers and children, headbands for clothing, heels, hoods, hosiery, infant and toddler one piece clothing, infants' shoes and boots, jackets, jeans, leggings, namely, pants that are partially jeans and partially leggings, knit dresses, ladies' underwear, leather belts, leather coats, leather shoes, leather vests, leotards and tights for women, men and children of nylon, cotton or other textile fibers, lingerie, lingerie accessories, namely, removable silicone breast enhancer pads used in a bra, men's and women's jackets, coats, trousers, vests, men's underwear, mufflers, nightgowns, overalls, rainwear, robes, sandals and beach shoes, scarves, shoes, short sets, shoulder wraps, shoulder wraps for clothing, silk scarves, stiletto heels, strapless bras, sweaters, sweatpants, swimsuits, tank tops, thongs, ties, tights, top coats, tops, trousers, tube tops, turtleneck sweaters, underwear, underwear, namely, boy shorts, v-neck sweaters, vests, wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirts, women's shoes, women's underwear, wraps, jewelry, bags, clutches, purses, coin purses, wallets, belts, hair accessories, hair clips, hair extensions, and cosmetics and perfume | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |