Drawing for BEANUT PUTTER

USPTO serial 85185524

BEANUT PUTTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BEANUT PUTTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Soya bean pasteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance