USPTO serial 85185933
URBAN MENU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4326512Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2013
- Examiner
- WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with URBAN MENU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AMMAR'S BUSINESS CONSULTING INC.
Toronto, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tony Bortolin
TONY BORTOLIN DENNISON ASSOCIATES301-133 RICHMOND STREET WESTTORONTO, ONTARIO, M5H2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out, delivery, and catering; on-line marketing of restaurants by means of advertising on webpages on a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMMAR'S BUSINESS CONSULTING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by URBAN MENU CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by URBAN MENU CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by URBAN MENU CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named URBAN MENU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |