Drawing for BRICOLAGE NEW YORK

USPTO serial 85186000

BRICOLAGE NEW YORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRICOLAGE NEW YORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Moshe D. Lapin

MOSHE D. LAPIN NATOLI-LEGAL, LLC305 Broadway7th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags for packaging of leather; Bags and holdalls for sports clothing; Bags for carrying babies' accessories; Canvas shopping bags; Carry-all bags; Duffel bags for travel; Flexible bags for garments; Garment bags for travel; Leather and imitation leather sport bags and general purpose trolley bags; Leather bags and wallets; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Luggage; Traveling bagsACTIVE—
024Bed and table linen; Bed blankets; Bed covers; Bed linen; Bed skirts; Bed spreads; Bed throws; Flat bed sheets; Pillow cases; Pillow coversACTIVE—
025Belts; Clothing, namely, khakis; Coats; Denims; Dress pants; Dresses; Flip flops; Footwear; Gloves as clothing; Head wear; Headbands for clothing; Jackets; Leather belts; Leather shoes; Leisure shoes; Pants; Scarves; Shoes; Skirts; Suits; Sweaters; Sweatshirts; Ties; Tops; Underwear; Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 4, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 24, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 19, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance