Drawing for MARIUS

USPTO serial 85187906

MARIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen D. Wilson, Esq.

Stephen D. Wilson, Esq. PRETI FLAHERTY BELIVEAU & PACHIOS, LLPOne City Center, P.O. Box 9546Portland, ME 04112-9546UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical scanning devices for imaging, used for identifying non-invasive tissue characterization of the atherosclerotic plaqueACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 5, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 5, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 28, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance