Drawing for NIMBLE

USPTO serial 85188724

NIMBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NIMBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee Grosskreuz Hechtel

2100 Smithtown AvenueLegal Dept.Ronkonkoma, NY 11779

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beverages, namely, non-alcoholic carbonated beverages, fruit-based beverages, fruit-flavored beverages, fruit juices, colas, mineral water, still water, herbal food beverages, non-carbonated soft drinks, soft drinks, vitamin enriched water, energy drinks, sports drinks, vegetable drinks, coconut-based beverages, aloe juice beverages, smoothies containing fruit, smoothies containing grains and oatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 23, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 6, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 6, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 6, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance