USPTO serial 85188863
CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONSTRUCTIONCOMPLETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Rinehart
STEVEN RINEHART RINEHART FETZER SIMONSEN & BOOTH50 W BROADWAY STE 1200SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-2029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Concrete construction machines; Diamond-pointed metal-cutting tools; Electric motors for power tools; Electronically and power operated tools, namely, pullers and components therefor, nut splitters, extractors, separators, spanners and coil spring compressors; Gear cutters; Grinding tools for grinding machines; Lathes; Machine tools for breaking up road surface material; Machine tools for forming, riveting, swaging, and flaring of metal and plastics; Machine tools, namely jaws for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; Machine tools, namely vices for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; Machines and lines composed thereof for the production of automobile parts, parts for the aforementioned machines, particularly foaming lines, die-cutting machines, molding presses, scoring machines, laminating machines, water jet cuttingmachines,milling machines, long fiber injection machines, parts for the aforementioned machines, particularly foaming tools, die-casting tools, die-cutting tools, molding tools, laminating tools; Machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials; Metalworking machine tools; Milling cutters; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, boring tools; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, drilling tools; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, milling tools; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, turning tools; Power tool parts, namely, collets; Power tools, namely, drill presses; Power tools, namely, end mills; Power tools, namely, hammer drills; Power tools, namely, hammer drivers; Power tools, namely, reamers; Power tools, namely, scroll saws; Power tools, namely, silicone pistols; Power tools, namely, thread mills; Power tools, namely, tile saws; Power tools, namely, related to residential construction; Power-operated tools, namely, buffers; Power-operated tools, namely, grinders; Thread milling cutters; Tool bits for machines; Tool grinding machines | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |