USPTO serial 85189075
TALKING ROBY THE ROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TALKING ROBY THE ROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas H. Zellerbach & Kristin S. Cornuelle
THOMAS H. ZELLERBACH & KRISTIN S. CORNUELLE ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP4 PARK PLZ STE 1600IRVINE, CA 92614-2558UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of computer and video games; entertainment provided via mobile or cellular telephone and/or other wireless devices; entertainment provided via the Internet or other computer network; online gaming services; production and distribution of short video and audio recordings; providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs and other multimedia entertainment; providing a web site featuring video and audio recordings made within computer games; providing computer and video games accessed and played via mobile and cellular phones and other wireless devices; providing entertainment shows distributed over electronic media, including global and local area computer networks; providing downloadable audio and video files in the field of entertainment relating to interactive computer game software, interactive video game software and interactive computer and video games; providing touch and voice driven games for electronic digital mobile devices; providing games for use on mobile devices; providing news and information in the field of entertainment regarding interactive computer game software, interactive video game software and interactive computer and video games, via electronic, wireless and computer networks; providing online computer and video games accessed and played via electronic, wireless and computer networks; providing online entertainment in the nature of multiplayer tournaments; creation, production and distribution of films, videos, animation, and computer generated images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 27, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |