USPTO serial 85189124
TALKING BACTERIA JOHN, JOHN & JOHN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4607870Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2014
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TALKING BACTERIA JOHN, JOHN & JOHN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon M. Gibbs
Jon M. Gibbs LOWNDES, DROSDICK, DOSTER, KANTOR & REED, P.A.215 North Eola DriveOrlando, FL 32801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ (Based on Use in Commerce) ] Computer game software and entertainment software in the nature of computer games for use on mobile and cellular phones [, handheld computers, computers, video game consoles, both handheld and free standing, and other wireless POS (point of service) devices ] ; computer game software; computer game software featuring music and motion picture soundtracks; computer game software and downloadable digital files featuring animated cartoons; downloadable computer game software via a global computer network [ and wireless POS (point of service) devices ] ; downloadable computer game software featuring touch and voice control; downloadable software for developing, designing, modifying, recording and customizing sound and speech; downloadable software for developing, designing, modifying, recording and customizing video, computer and online games; downloadable computer game software for electronic apparatus using interactive and multimedia functions; interactive multimedia computer game software programs; computer game programs for entertainment featuring character recognition, voice recognition, touch sensitivity, light sensitivity and gravity sensitivity; downloadable software for playing video, computer and online games; speech recognition software; touch and voice driven interactive computer game software; video and audio games, namely, computer game programs featuring interactive video and audio content [ (Based on 44(e)) ] Application development tool programs for personal computers and/or mobile digital electronic devices and/or hand held computers and mobile telephones; software for enabling video computer and online games to be run on multiple platforms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 8, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Out Fit 7 Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Out Fit 7 Limited
- Other trademarks owned by OUTFIT7 LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Outfit7 Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TALKING BACTERIA JOHN, JOHN & JOHN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2021 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |