USPTO serial 85189338
MAKING LIFE A LITTLE EASIER!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAKING LIFE A LITTLE EASIER!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
Joseph A. Sebolt SAND & SEBOLT4940 Munson Street NWAegis Tower, Suite 1100Canton, OH 44718-3615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FROZEN MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES; CANDIED FRUIT SNACKS; DEHYDRATED FRUIT SNACKS; FRUIT-BASED SNACK FOODS; MEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS; NUT AND SEED-BASED SNACK BARS; POTATO-BASED SNACK FOODS; SNACK FOOD DIPS; SNACK MIXES CONSISTING OF DEHYDRATED FRUIT AND PROCESSED NUTS; TOFU-BASED SNACK FOODS; VEGETABLE-BASED SNACK FOODS; DIPS; PREPACKAGED DINNERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, SEAFOOD OR POULTRY SERVED WITH PASTA; CHEESE SPREADS; DAIRY-BASED SPREADS; FRUIT-BASED SPREADS; MEAT-BASED SPREADS; VEGETABLE-BASED SPREADS; FROZEN, PREPARED OR PACKAGED SIDE DISHES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MASHED POTATOES OR PUREED VEGETABLES; FROZEN, PREPARED OR PACKAGED SIDE DISHES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POTATOES MIXED WITH VEGETABLES; SHELLED NUTS; ROASTED NUTS; PROCESSED NUTS; NUT-BASED SNACK FOODS; PREPARED OR PACKAGED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POTATOES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | FOOD STUFFING MIXES; FROZEN MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA OR RICE; SALSA; SAUCES; SALAD DRESSINGS; CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS; MULTI-GRAIN-BASED SNACK FOODS; RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS; FROZEN CONFECTIONERIES; RICE; FROZEN, PREPARED OR PACKAGED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF RICE; PITA BREAD AND PITA BREAD CHIPS; FRUIT PIES; AND PIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |