Drawing for JAWBONE ERA

USPTO serial 85189346

JAWBONE ERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAWBONE ERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer D. Arkowitz

JENNIFER D ARKOWITZ KILPATRICK TOWNSEND AND STOCKTON LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTRFL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audio speakers for use with cellular and telephone communication systems; MP3 playersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 22, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 30, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 31, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 1, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 14, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 14, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 14, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 28, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 28, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 27, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 9, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance