USPTO serial 85189564
ACTIVECLOAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVECLOAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LS Hoofddorp, NL
LS Hoofddorp, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BHARATI BAKSHANI
BHARATI BAKSHANI Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic apparatus for broadcasting, recording, transmitting, or reproduction of sound or images; blank tapes for storage of computer data; data processing equipment, namely, computers, computer programs for use in the reproduction, processing and streaming of audio, video and multimedia content, computer software for use in the distribution of digital content, computer chips; apparatus and instruments for the encoding and decoding of electrical signals; computer software for use in connection with the internet, namely, computer software for secure distribution and ongoing monetization of digital video and audio files, computer software for use in the safeguarding of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files, computer software for encryption; computer apparatus and instruments for use in connection with the internet, namely, computers, handheld computers, set-top boxes, televisions and digital media streaming devices, computer hardware for upload, storage, retrieval, download, transmission and delivery of digital content; blank smart cards; encoded smart cards containing programming used for the distribution of digital content; magnetically encoded identity cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | broadcasting and communication services, namely, television broadcasting, satellite television and radio broadcasting, cable television broadcasting, internet broadcasting, broadband internet broadcasting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design, installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; maintenance and updating of computer network software; computer hardware and software development; computer programming and computer software design services for others; design services for others in the field of artificial intelligence; product developmental research conducted in the fields of technology enhancement and technological products for use in the telecommunications industry and broadband industry via cable, telephone or satellite | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IRDETO B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by IRDETO B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ACTIVECLOAK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |