USPTO serial 85189642
GOURMET DU VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2012
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOURMET DU VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHICAGO, IL
CONCEPT GOURMET DU VILLAGE ULC
MORIN HEIGHTS, QUEBEC, CA
CONCEPT MIKE & LINDA TOTT INC.
Morin Heights, Quebec, CA
CONCEPT MIKE & LINDA TOTT INC.
Morin Heights, Quebec, CA
CONCEPT MIKE & LINDA TOTT INC.
Morin Heights, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Samlan
Stephen B. Samlan Knechtel, Demeur & Samlan525 W. Monroe St.Suite 2360Chicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Kitchen tableware and containers of stainless steel, stoneware, porcelain, namely, cheese bakers, casserole dishes, dip chillers, dishes, platters, bowls, chicken bakers, beverage pitchers, canisters, butter keepers, and glass and stoneware beverageware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; flour; cereal based snack food; bread; pastries; candy; flavored ices; honey; treacle ; yeast; baking powder ; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; spices; ice; chocolate based beverages; chocolate | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | beer, mineral and aerated waters; other non-alcoholic drinks in the nature of soft drinks, smoothies, fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups for making beverages in the nature of smoothies, soft drinks, fruit drinks, fruit flavoured drinks; other preparations for making beverages in the nature of flavoured powder mix for smoothies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REICH FINE FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT GOURMET DU VILLAGE ULC
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT MIKE & LINDA TOTT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT MIKE & LINDA TOTT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT MIKE & LINDA TOTT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GOURMET DU VILLAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 22, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 22, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |