Drawing for X

USPTO serial 85190090

X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachelle A. Dubow, Esq.

Rachelle A. Dubow, Esq. Bingham McCutchen LLPOne Federal StreetBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Lacrosse sticks; hockey sticks; sport balls; athletic protective equipment, namely, hip pads, body pads, knee pads, tail bone protectors, athletic supporters and protective cups, chest protectors, arm guards, shin guards, neck guards, mouth guards, football and bowling gloves, athletic wrist and joint supportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 15, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 28, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 2, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 27, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 21, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2012IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2012INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 15, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 8, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 29, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance