USPTO serial 85190572
FIGHT LIKE A GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIGHT LIKE A GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan N. Carter
RYAN N. CARTER NYEMASTER GOODE, P.C.625 1ST ST SE STE 400CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52401-2032UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Refrigerator magnets | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical wearing apparel, namely, scrub pants; Medical wearing apparel, namely, scrub tops | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; Key chains as jewellery | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Aprons; Baby bodysuits; Bandanas; Beach cover-ups; Beanies; Camisoles; Caps; Footwear for women; Hats; Hooded pullovers; Jackets; Lab coats; Long sleeve pullovers; Panties; Pants; Pullovers; Scarves; Shirts; Shirts for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Short-sleeved shirts; Shorts; Slippers; Sport shirts; Sports bras; Sports jerseys; Sports jerseys and breeches for sports; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tank tops; Vests; Visors; Wind shirts; Wristbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |