USPTO serial 85191150
TRISTAR PETROSERV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRISTAR PETROSERV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tod Tumey
TOD TUMEY TUMEY L.L.P.PO BOX 22188HOUSTON, TX 77227-2188UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Centrifuges for refinery and process industry needs, namely, centrifuges for heavy solids, wastewater, and crude oil; separators for refinery and process industry needs, namely, separators for heavy solids, wastewater, and crude oil; machines for tank, vessel, and containment cleaning; machines for refinery and process industry use for dividing, clarifying, separating, mixing, and conveying of mixtures of substances, namely, decanters for heavy solids, wastewater, and crude oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Thermal oxidizers for industrial use with degassing tanks and vessels, namely, thermal oxidizers for airborne volatile organic compound control and odor control | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance of industrial equipment, namely, tank and vessel cleaning services; consultancy regarding industrial tank and vessel cleaning; cleaning of pits, ponds, and containments | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely, treatment of sulfides, hydrocarbons, pyrophorics, benzene, sludge, crude oil, fuel oil, decanted slurry oil, sour water, slop oil, asphalt, gasoline, wastewater, and residual oils; sludge extraction, namely, robotic sludge extraction for the purpose of treating soil and water by removing sludge; waste stream treating, namely, processing sludge streams for coker injection; treating waste hydrocarbons, namely, processing waste hydrocarbons to break emulsions, perform two-phase liquid and solid separations, and perform three-phase oil, water, and solid separations; sludge separation and dewatering, namely, centrifugal sludge separation and dewatering; controlling volatile organic compounds and odors in tanks and vessels, namely, chemical processing and thermal oxidation; decontamination and degassing of industrial equipment, namely, decontamination and degassing of tanks and vessels; consultancy regarding industrial tank and vessel degassing and decontamination; environmental remediation services, namely, decontamination of pits, ponds, and containments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services regarding tanks, vessels, and containments; consultancy and advisory services regarding engineering of tanks, vessels, and containments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TriStar PetroServ, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TriStar PetroServ, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRISTAR PETROSERV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |