USPTO serial 85191154
MIDNIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIDNIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 North Capitol Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated beverages, punch, soft drinks, and non-alcoholic cocktails; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations, namely, concentrates and powders used in the preparation of carbonated beverages, soft drinks and fruit-flavored beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, arranging and conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the fields of alcoholic beverages, drinks, restaurants, bars, drink recipes, drink trends, culture, and entertainment; educational demonstrations; educational services, namely, conducting programs in the fields of alcoholic beverages, drinks, restaurants, bars, drink recipes, drink trends, culture, and entertainment; entertainment information; organizing and arranging exhibitions for entertainment purposes; arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment events; organizing sporting and cultural activities; entertainment services, namely, providing information in the field of leisure related to recreational activities and culture; entertainment in the nature of ongoing multimedia internet programs and ongoing series in the fields of recreational activities, culture, hobbies, current events and leisure broadcast on global computer networks; entertainment and educational services, namely, providing non-downloadable online magazines and newsletters in the fields of alcoholic beverages, drinks, restaurants, bars, drink recipes, drink trends, culture, and entertainment; entertainment services, namely, fan clubs in the fields of drink recipes and beverages; entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing virtual environments in which users can interact for recreational, leisure or entertainment purposes; entertainment in the nature of providing an on-line publication in the nature of an interactive encyclopedia in the fields of drinks and drink recipes; providing a web site where users can post ratings, reviews and recommendations on events and activities in the field of entertainment and education; entertainment services, namely, arranging of contests; and on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring user-defined content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |