USPTO serial 85191207
BONUS DROP: OLYMPUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BONUS DROP: OLYMPUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SPIELO INTERNATIONAL CANADA ULC
MONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen Caissie-Dupuis
COLLEEN CAISSIE-DUPUIS C/O SPIELO MANUFACTURING ULC328 URQUHART AVENUEMONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, E1H2R6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Reconfigurable casino and lottery gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines and operational computer game software therefor(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Reconfigurable casino and lottery gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines and operational computer game software therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |