USPTO serial 85192011
HILMOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HILMOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher B. Schneider
CHRISTOPHER B. SCHNEIDER NEWELL RUBBERMAID2707 BUTTERFIELD RDOAK BROOK, IL 60523-1278UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vacuum pumps; compressors for recovering and recycling refrigerant gasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |