USPTO serial 85192090
CHOP CHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHOP CHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EAST MELBOURNE VIC, AU
PRAHRAN VIC 3181, AU
PRAHRAN VIC 3181, AU
PRAHRAN VIC 3181, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanja Proehl
TANJA PROEHL GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD.300 S WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606-6752UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; retail and wholesale services in respect of food, foodstuffs and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; restaurants, including self service restaurants; snack bars; cafes and cafeterias | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jambren Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by JSM Nominees Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by JSJ Nominees (Aust) Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by DJM Nominees (Aust) Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CHOP CHOP
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |