USPTO serial 85192300
GREEN-FELDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN-FELDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan E. Schiavelli
ALAN E. SCHIAVELLI ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP1300 17TH ST N STE 1800ARLINGTON, VA 22209-3873UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, laundry detergents, laundry bleach, laundry soap, laundry starch; soaps, namely, bath soaps, cosmetic soaps, bar soaps, liquid soaps, medicated soaps, soaps for household use, soaps for personal use; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentrifices | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations for use in dermatology; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic substances, namely, meal replacement bars, meal replacement drinks, meal replacement powders, nutritional and dietary supplements, protein supplements, mineral supplements, vitamin supplements, dietetic foods, and dietetic beverages adapted for medical use; food for babies; plasters for medical purposes, materials for dressing, namely, bandages, gauze; material for stopping teeth, dental wax; all purpose disinfectants, disinfectants for hygienic purposes, disinfectants for sanitary purposes; nutritional supplements not for medical purposes, based on proteins, fats, roughage or carbohydrate | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | meat, fish that is not live, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; soups and preparations for making soups; jellies, jams, fruit purees, eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals and cereal based snack foods, bread, bakery goods and pastry, edible ices; honey, treacle, yeast, baking-powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces, seasoning mixes for sauces, spices, flour sourdough for making bread, candies, in particular gummy candies, muesli, grain-based food bars also containing fruits and chocolate, spread containing chocolate, nuts and nougat; chocolate, cocoa-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | beer; mineral and aerated waters and non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages, preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, vegetables juice, isotonic drinks and sport drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seitenbacher GmbH & Co., Naturkost
- Other trademarks owned by Seitenbacher GmbH & Co., Naturkost
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GREEN-FELDER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |