USPTO serial 85192504
THE FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE TODAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE TODAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDING1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services; Physician services | ACTIVE | Sep 22, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 6, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |