Drawing for HD VISION AVIATORS

USPTO serial 85192512

HD VISION AVIATORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HD VISION AVIATORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Drangel

JASON M DRANGEL EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 E 42ND STREETSUITE 2410NEW YORK, NY 10165-0011

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sunglasses; Cases for sunglasses; sunglass holders; Sunglass accessories, namely, clips for holding sunglassesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 21, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 21, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 21, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 1, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 1, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance