USPTO serial 85192722
APPUPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, AMY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APPUPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gaithersburg, MD
Gaithersburg, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Joseph English
D. JOSEPH ENGLISH DUANE MORRIS LLP505 9TH ST NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | HOSTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS FOR HANDHELD AND MOBILE DEVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF REMOTE MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, SOCIAL NETWORKING AND MEDIA APPLICATIONS FOR OTHERS; DEVELOPING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, PROVIDING UPDATES AND TROUBLESHOOTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |