Drawing for HARMONY HEALTH & BEAUTY

USPTO serial 85192910

HARMONY HEALTH & BEAUTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARMONY HEALTH & BEAUTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jami A. Gekas

JAMI A. GEKAS Edwards Wildman Palmer LLPP.O. Box 130F.D.R. StationNew York, NY 10150

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetics; Eye make-up remover; Face and body creams; Face and body lotions; Facial beauty masks; Facial make-up; Fragrances; Nail polish; Non-medicated cleansers for personal use, namely, skin cleansers and facial cleansersACTIVE—
004CandlesACTIVE—
018Cosmetic bags sold emptyACTIVE—
021Cosmetic brushes; Facial cleansing sponges; Hairbrushes; Sponges used for applying makeupACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 21, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2014EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Dec 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 30, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 21, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 24, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 19, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance