Drawing for PATHTERMS

USPTO serial 85192941

PATHTERMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATHTERMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana O. Lynch

Dana O. Lynch Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P.Seven Saint Paul StreetBaltimore, MD 21202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Providing an on-line computer database featuring terms and metadata to be utilized in on-line searchable databases related to pathologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance