Drawing for THE STATE OF THE ART IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 85193067

THE STATE OF THE ART IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4024198Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 6, 2011
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE STATE OF THE ART IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex Patel

Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura Blvd Suite 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software development; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Computer software development in the field of business development and management; Consulting in the field of software development in the field of business development and management; Customized software development servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2022CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 6, 2020REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 27, 2017NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
May 27, 20178.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
May 27, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 12, 2017ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 31, 2012CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 10, 2012CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - CERTIFICATE OF REG MAILED—
Sep 17, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 6, 2011R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2011CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 11, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2010TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Dec 17, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance