USPTO serial 85193179
DSSC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DSSC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
MAX VERN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for packing, wrapping, boxing, conveying, handling, storing, or inspecting articles, and parts thereof; machine tools for packing, wrapping, boxing, conveying, handling, storing, or inspecting articles, namely, case forming machines, and parts thereof; packaging machines for dosing, bagging, packing, cartoning, case packing, palletizing and wrapping, and parts thereof; machinery for the packaging industry, namely, material handling machines, conveyers and packaging handling and processing machines, and parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Cardboard boxes; cardboard and corrugated storage boxes; cardboard and corrugated shipping containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and installation of machinery for packaging, packing, wrapping, boxing, conveying, handling, storing or inspecting articles | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing services for others in the field of machinery for packaging, packing, wrapping, boxing, conveying, handling, storing or inspecting articles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AFA Systems Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DSSC
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |