Drawing for DSSC

USPTO serial 85193179

DSSC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DSSC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Vern

MAX VERN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for packing, wrapping, boxing, conveying, handling, storing, or inspecting articles, and parts thereof; machine tools for packing, wrapping, boxing, conveying, handling, storing, or inspecting articles, namely, case forming machines, and parts thereof; packaging machines for dosing, bagging, packing, cartoning, case packing, palletizing and wrapping, and parts thereof; machinery for the packaging industry, namely, material handling machines, conveyers and packaging handling and processing machines, and parts thereofACTIVE—
016Cardboard boxes; cardboard and corrugated storage boxes; cardboard and corrugated shipping containersACTIVE—
037Repair and installation of machinery for packaging, packing, wrapping, boxing, conveying, handling, storing or inspecting articlesACTIVE—
040Manufacturing services for others in the field of machinery for packaging, packing, wrapping, boxing, conveying, handling, storing or inspecting articlesACTIVE—
042Design for others in the field of engineeringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 10, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance