Drawing for Serial No. 85193330

USPTO serial 85193330

Serial No. 85193330

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85193330?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kumiko Ide

KUMIKO IDE WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN LLP1250 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036-2657UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee; Cocoa; Ice; Sweets; Pastries; Dessert puddings; Flan; Cream puffs; Cakes; Chocolate; Chocolate-based snack foods; Rice cakes filled with sweet beans (daifuku); Sweet dumplings (dango); Syrup-covered sweet beans and fruits (anmitsu); Candies; Ice cream desserts; Sweet bakery goods; Bakery desserts; Bars of sweet jellied bean paste (yokan); rice cake covered with bean jam (ohagi); Japanese-style pancakes filled with sweet bean paste (dorayaki); Sweet pounded rice cakes (mochi-gashi); non-frozen Japanese-style desserts containing sweet bean paste; BreadACTIVE—
032Soft drinks; Fruit drinksACTIVE—
043Providing of food and drinkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 10, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 20, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 20, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 18, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 18, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance