USPTO serial 85193515
MIZU MIZU SHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIZU MIZU SHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Manhattan beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Newland
VICTORIA NEWLAND LAW OFFICES OF VICTORIA NEWLAND338 VIA VERA CRUZ, SUITE 250SAN MARCOS, CA 92075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Anti-aging cleanser; Anti-aging cream; Anti-aging cream containing a retinoic ingredient not for medical purposes; Anti-aging moisturizer; Anti-aging toner; Anti-bacterial soap; Anti-wrinkle cream; Bar soap; Bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes; Bath beads; Bath cream; Bath crystals; Bath fizzies; Bath flakes; Bath foam; Bath gel; Bath herbs; Bath lotion; Bath milks; Bath oil; Bath pearls; Bath powder; Bath salts; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Bathing lotions; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Beauty gels; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty milks; Beauty serums; Beauty soap; Bergamot oil; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body emulsions; Body lotion; Body mask cream; Body mask lotion; Body masks; Body milk; Body oil; Body powder; Body scrub; Body splash; Body spray used as a personal deodorant and as fragrance; Cloths or tissues impregnated with a skin cleanser; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Eye cream; Eye gels; Eye liner; Eye lotions; Eye make-up; Eye make-up remover; Eye pencils; Eye shadows; Eye-shadow; Eyebrow colors; Eyebrow cosmetics; Eyebrow pencils; Eyeglass lens cleaning solutions; Eyelash tint; Eyeliner; Face and body beauty creams; Face and body creams; Face and body glitter; Face and body lotions; Face and body milk; Face creams; Face creams and cleansers containing benzoyl peroxide for cosmetic purposes; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial beauty masks; Facial cleaning preparation, namely, salicylic acne cleanser not for medical purposes; Facial cleansers; Facial cleansing grains; Facial cleansing milk; Facial concealer; Facial cream; Facial emulsions; Facial lotion; Facial make-up; Facial masks; Facial moisturizer with SPF; Facial scrubs; Facial washes; Fair complexion cream; Fragranced facial moisturizer; Fragrances; Fragrances and perfumery; Gel eye masks; Hair masks; Hair oils; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sheen spray; Japanese hair fixing oil (bintsuke-abura); Jasmine oil for personal use; Lotions for cellulite reduction; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Lotions for face and body care; Natural essential oils; Natural mineral make-up; Natural soap bars; Naturally handmade soap bars; Night cream; Non-medicated acne treatment preparations; Non-medicated anti-aging serum; Non-medicated balms for use on face and body; Non-medicated bath preparations; Non-medicated bath salts; Non-medicated body soaks; Non-medicated facial and eye serum containing antioxidants; Plant and herb extracts sold as components of cosmetics; Skin lightening creams; Skin lotion; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin moisturizing gel; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations; Wrinkle resistant cream; Wrinkle-minimizing cosmetic preparations for topical facial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |