Drawing for DAIRYLUX

USPTO serial 85194281

DAIRYLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DAIRYLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Seiter

WILLIAM J. SEITER SEITER & CO.220 26TH ST STE 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402-2500UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dairy products and dairy foods in this class; dairy based beverages and powders; milk; Ultra High Temperature milk (UHT milk); extended shelf life milk (ESL milk); milk products; milk based products; condensed milk; milk concentrate; milk protein; milk powder and dried milk; milk substitutes in this class; milk beverages including flavored and fortified milk beverages (milk predominating); cream (dairy products); butter; beurre noisette (brown butter); edible oils and fats; margarine and food spreads including blends of margarine, butter and other edible oils; products included in this class consisting wholly or principally of edible oils or of edible fats for use in creaming coffee and like drinks; food and dietary supplements for human consumption (other than medicated, or predominantly of vitamins, minerals or trace elements); proteins and protein products for human consumption; products used as ingredients in the production of foodstuffs; cheese including cottage cheese, cream cheese, soft and hard cheeses; cheese products; cultured milk products; cultured dairy products including sour cream and creme fraiche; yoghurt; flavored yoghurt; fruit flavored yoghurt; yoghurt powder; yoghurt for drinking; yoghurt based beverages in this class; yoghurt based desserts; mousse and mousse-like products (milk and dairy predominating); dessert products in this class (dairy products predominating); flavored dairy desserts; dairy snacks (milk and dairy products predominating); whey; casein; food preserves in this class including food spreads consisting principally of dairy products; jellies for foodACTIVE—
030Flavorings, other than essential oils; food flavorings, other than essential oils; beverage flavorings, other than essential oils; flavor enhancers for food, other than essential oils; butter flavorings; hazelnut flavoringsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance