USPTO serial 85194300
VOICE PEERING GRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOICE PEERING GRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Taufer
PAUL A. TAUFER DLA PIPER LLP (US)1650 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, telephony services, VoIP telephony services, digital telephony services, Internet Protocol telephony services, transmitting audio, video, data, image, text, music, sound, messages, and facsimiles, communication services, namely, person-to-person network computer services; electronic transmission of audio, video and other data and documents among computers and connecting carriers to transport calls anytime and to anywhere; intelligent routing gateway services, namely, telecommunications routing and junction services; electronic transmission of data and messages, click-to-call services, namely, communication services initiated via web links on computers or mobile devices, video communications services, auto video and audio conferencing services, video and audio conference-on-demand services, blast calling services, namely, transmitting messages to many recipients at once, bridge to connect services for audio and video conferencing, electronically transmitting audio, video, data and documents; telephone communication and Internet telephony services; VoIP services; intelligent network services for providing a network architecture for fixed and mobile telecom networks having features such as caller identification, pre-payment and call answer; services to facilitate interworking between the public telephone network and Internet Protocol networks; managed computer and communications gateway and network connection services; intelligent routing services featuring managed directory identification and address resolution | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |