USPTO serial 85194316
DIGITAL SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITAL SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Levy
MARK LEVY HINMAN HOWARD & KATTELL LLP80 EXCHANGE STREETP O BOX 5250BINGHAMTON, NY 13901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | mobile video systems comprising digital cameras and digital recorders for mounting in vehicles; mobile digital video surveillance products, namely, video cameras; digital video and audio recorders, receivers and transmitters; computer hardware and computer software for capturing and integrating video, voice and data; and printed manuals sold with the foregoing | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2008 |
| 042 | technical support services, namely, providing technical advice in the field of mobile video system installation and troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosis of computer hardware problems and software problems related thereto | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |