USPTO serial 85195708
DHYBRID ENERGY UNCOVERED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DHYBRID ENERGY UNCOVERED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. George, UT
St. George, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. Edwards
TERRENCE J. EDWARDS CLAYTON, HOWARTH & CANNON, P.C.PO BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091-1909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, providing information to others about businesses in the fields of clean energy technologies, mixed fuel technologies, energy usage management and related technologies, and energy efficiency and related technologies via a global computer network or internet; internet advertising services; providing an on-line commercial information database or directory on the internet or global computer network; providing a commercial information database or directory for use by others; the bringing together of consumers and providers of a variety of goods and services in the field(s) of clean energy technologies, mixed fuel technologies, energy usage management and related technologies, and energy efficiency and related technologies, all for commercial purposes via a network; providing an interactive website featuring information about businesses in the fields of clean energy technologies, mixed fuel technologies, energy usage management and related technologies, and energy efficiency and related technologies; providing information related to energy efficiency and energy usage management via a global computer network or internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Providing information to others about the installation and maintenance of clean energy technologies, mixed fuel technologies, energy usage management technologies, energy usage management-related technologies, energy efficiency technologies, and energy efficiency-related technologies via a global computer network or internet; providing an interactive website featuring information about the installation and maintenance of clean energy technologies, mixed fuel technologies, energy usage management technologies, energy usage management-related technologies, energy efficiency technologies, and energy efficiency-related technologies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information to others about the design and development of clean energy technologies, mixed fuel technologies, energy usage management and related technologies, and energy efficiency and related technologies via a global computer network or internet; providing an interactive website featuring information about the design and development of clean energy technologies, mixed fuel technologies, energy usage management and related technologies, and energy efficiency and related technologies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by dHybrid, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by dHybrid, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DHYBRID ENERGY UNCOVERED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |