USPTO serial 85196223
SILENT SLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2013
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILENT SLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Uxbridge, Ontario, CA
Uxbridge, Ontario, CA
Uxbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Maier
CHRISTOPHER J. MAIER MAIER & MAIER, PLLC345 SOUTH PATRICK ST.ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3512UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Dampers in the nature of non-metal rubber door stops for cabinets, furniture drawers and doors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Dampers in the nature of non-metal, non-rubber door stops for cabinets, furniture drawers and doors; Dampers in the nature of non-metal door stops of plastic for cabinets, furniture drawers and doors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INOVA Hardware Lines Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INOVA Hardware Lines Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INOVA Hardware Lines Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named SILENT SLAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2013 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |