Drawing for ORGANIC SUPERFOOD CHOCOLATE

USPTO serial 85196249

ORGANIC SUPERFOOD CHOCOLATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ORGANIC SUPERFOOD CHOCOLATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Holmes

STEPHEN HOLMES BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES101 DYER ST FL 5PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3926UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Chocolate; Chocolate bars; Chocolate candies; Chocolate chips; Chocolate covered cocoa nibs; Chocolate covered fruit; Chocolate covered nuts; Chocolate covered popcorn; Chocolate covered pretzels; Chocolate covered raisins; Chocolate covered roasted coffee beans; Chocolate fondue; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Chocolate for confectionery and bread; Chocolate for toppings; Chocolate mousse; Chocolate pastes; Chocolate powder; Chocolate sauce; Chocolate syrup; Chocolate topping; Chocolate truffles; Chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Chocolate-covered potato chips; Chocolates containing nutrients; Cocoa; Cocoa beverages with milk; Cocoa extracts for human consumption; Cocoa mixes; Cocoa powder; Cocoa spreads; Cocoa-based beverages; Cocoa-based condiments and seasonings for food and drink; Cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products; Filled chocolate; Milk chocolate; Prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; Processed cacaoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance