USPTO serial 85196264
DB DEUTSCHEBACK BETTER BAKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DB DEUTSCHEBACK BETTER BAKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus H. Luepke
MARCUS H. LUEPKE FINNEGAN HENDERSON ET AL, LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Products to improve the quality of bakery products, for industrial and traditional use, namely, emulsifiers for use in the manufacture of foods, enzymes for use in the bakery industry, enzymes for use in the food industry, food preservative compositions, antioxidants used in the manufacture of beverages, food products and food supplements, artificial sweeteners, dough stabilizer, enzyme stabilizer, humectants; ingredients or filler used in the manufacture of foods and beverages, namely, flour improvers, flour and baking improvers in the nature of ascorbic acid, azodicarbonamide, calcium peroxide, L-cysteine-hydrochloride, Sodium metabisulfite, ammonium chloride, phosphates, amylase; food additives, namely, pH control agents for foods; antifoaming agents; bakery releasing agents in the form of emulsifiers, Vitamin E and distilled water | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Vitamin and mineral additives for use as ingredients in the food industry; dietary fiber as an additive for food products | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flavorings other than essential oils; flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes; thickening agents for use in cooking; flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; confectioner's coatings in the nature of edible shellac coatings for foods; ham glaze; natural sweeteners; food starch; raising agents, namely, yeast for use as an ingredient in foods, and food leavening agents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stern-Wywiol Gruppe Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Stern-Wywiol Gruppe Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DB DEUTSCHEBACK BETTER BAKING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |