Drawing for MEGA KING

USPTO serial 85196855

MEGA KING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGA KING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Iris Hess

M. IRIS HESS LADAS & PARRY LLP5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009battery chargers; batteries; batteries for flashlight; solar cells; wireless earphones; wireless computer keyboards; protective films for cellular telephone screens; covers for cellular telephones made of leather or siliconeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 16, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 16, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2011TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Feb 7, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance