USPTO serial 85197206
IDENTIFILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDENTIFILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VANCOUVER, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP5845 RICHMOND HWY STE 415ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303-1872UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR IDENTIFYING FILES AND SOFTWARE PROGRAMS RESIDENT ON A COMPUTER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |