USPTO serial 85197339
BIGGREEN PROFESSIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIGGREEN PROFESSIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary C. Bonnema
MARY C. BONNEMA MCGARRY BAIR PC32 MARKET AVE SW STE 500GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-4065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | All purpose cleaning preparations for carpets, upholstery, floors, textiles, and hard surfaces; all purpose cleaning preparations for kitchens and bathrooms; glass cleaner; floor cleaning preparation; floor polish; furniture polish; stain remover; carpet shampoo; upholstery shampoo | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Electrical cleaning devices, namely, floor cleaning machines; vacuum cleaners; carpet and upholstery cleaning machines; steam cleaners; automatic floor scrubbers; combination electrical cleaning devices, namely, combination vacuum cleaners and floor scrubbers; electric sweepers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cleaning products, namely, non-electric carpet sweepers; mops; brooms; dust pans; floor dusters; furniture dusters; dust cloths; squeegees; scrubbers; and cleaning sponges | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Commercial cleaning services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BISSELL Homecare, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BISSELL Homecare, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named BIGGREEN PROFESSIONAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |