USPTO serial 85198387
LECHTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LECHTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
JEFFREY M. FURR FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT RDUTICA, OH 43080-9604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bakeware; barware, namely corkscrews, ice buckets, tongs, wine cooling pails, cocktail shakers, jiggers; household utensils, namely, strainers; cookware, namely pots, pans, skillets and steamers; dinnerware made of china, earthenware, stoneware or plastic; teapots not made of precious metal; coffeepots not made of precious metal; sugar bowls and creamers not made of precious metal; stemware and glassware, namely tumblers, drinking glasses, cocktail glasses, goblets, flutes, wine glasses, shot glasses, decorative glasses, pitchers, decanters; cups, bowls, serving plates, serving trays and jugs; kitchenware, namely non-electric kettles; spice racks; brooms; cooking utensils, namely banana trees, basters, beater whips, bottle openers, bowl covers, cake racks, cake and pie servers, cake tins, cooling racks, cake covers, cake decorating sets, coasters, colanders for household use, cookie presses, cookie cutters, cookie molds, cookie stamps, corn server and holder sets, corn skewers, cutting boards, dish drying racks, non-electric egg beaters, egg cups, egg piercer, egg poachers, egg ring, egg separator, flour sifters, fondue sets, funnels, garlic keepers in the nature of (clarify specific nature of goods, e.g., plastic storage containers), garlic presses, graters, hand-operated coffee grinders, honey dipping utensils, ice cream scoops, ice cube trays, jar openers, non-electric juicers, kitchen utensil tool caddies, knife blocks, kitchen ladles, manual milk frothers, melon ballers, mixing bowls, mixing spoons, cake molds, mushroom brushes, pastry brushes, pizza stones, potato masher, potato ricer, poultry lacers, rolling pins, salad servers, salad spinners, salt and pepper shakers, salt and pepper grinders, serving spoons, shish kebob sets, cooking skewers and skimmers, slotted spoons, soap dispensers, spaghetti measurer, and spaghetti tongs; household utensils, namely spatulas, spoon rest, stirrers, strainers, tea bag holders, tea balls and made of non-precious metal, tea infusers, tea strainers, whisks, wine pouring spouts, oil and vinegar sets, and spice, cheese, flour and icing shakers; recipe boxes; napkin holders; napkin rings not made of precious metals; vases, bowls and serving trays made of glass, ceramic, porcelain, plastic, stainless steel or wood | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |