Drawing for LIVE INTELLIGENTLY

USPTO serial 85198953

LIVE INTELLIGENTLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IMAM, AMEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVE INTELLIGENTLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Stringham

JOHN C. STRINGHAM WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLESuite 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for controlling and monitoring building control, alarm and interaction systems; Bags and backpacks specifically designed for holding laptop computers; Electrical and electronic building control human input/output interfaces, namely, electronic display interfaces and control panels; Fire and burglar alarms for residential and commercial buildings; gas alarms, namely, carbon monoxide detectors; emergency alarms, namely, emergency evacuation devices, namely, fire alarm control panels, smoke detectors, heat detectors, alarm pull stations, audible and visible notification appliances, strobes, sirens, horns, and speakers; Trouble alarms for residential and commercial buildings, namely, sound alarms, motion detectors for perimeters, doors and windows, and electronic signaling mechanism for detecting connection or power failure; Lighting systems, namely, lighting controls; Energy management systems, namely, electric controls for monitoring and adjusting energy usage; Video cameras; Video systems consisting of video cameras, monitors, recorders and video transmission apparatus; automation lock systems comprising electronic controls for monitoring and controlling electronic locking mechanisms; home and office HVAC automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, electric controlled devices, software and electronic control devices for monitoring and controlling home and office heating and cooling operationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 10, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 5, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 28, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 7, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance