Drawing for LIFECYCLE

USPTO serial 85200445

LIFECYCLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFECYCLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for maintaining conveyor systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 15, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 15, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 29, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Feb 23, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 20, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 19, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 16, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Apr 11, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 11, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 11, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 12, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 24, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 21, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance