Drawing for SENSYS

USPTO serial 85201042

SENSYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan E. Hollander, Esq.

Susan E. Hollander, Esq. K&L Gates630 Hansen WayPalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic sensors and radar, all for supervising, detecting and regulating land vehicle public road and highway traffic flows, land vehicle public road and highway speed control and for land vehicle public road and highway traffic control and securityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 14, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 11, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 27, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance