Drawing for C3

USPTO serial 85203103

C3

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C3?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Oberdick

DAVID G. OBERDICK MEYER, UNKOVIC & SCOTT LLP535 SMITHFIELD STREET, SUITE 1300PITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automated systems, namely, software, hardware and communications devices for planning, scheduling, controlling, monitoring and providing information on clean rooms and the application processes within, but excluding customized machines and robotic equipment for use in the manufacturing industry, namely, factory automationACTIVE
042Technical consulting and assistance with clean room systems in the field of custom design and engineering of clean rooms, and adherence to quality control standards, but excluding engineering services in the fields of manufacturing process improvement, factory automation systems and machines, and information systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 16, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 10, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Sep 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 5, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 23, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 13, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 13, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 11, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 5, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 8, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 20, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Dec 20, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 20, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 29, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 16, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 14, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 12, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 28, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 31, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance