Drawing for URGENT DOE

USPTO serial 85205198

URGENT DOE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with URGENT DOE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROSE AUSLANDER

SCOTT M. SISUN CARTER LEDYARD & MILBURN LLP2 WALL ST FL 13NEW YORK, NY 10005-2072UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Animal hunting decoysACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Feb 11, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 11, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 30, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jul 31, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 31, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 31, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance