USPTO serial 85205593
WHITE, BLACK AND BLUES THEY BROUGHT THE BLUES TO ROCK & ROLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITE, BLACK AND BLUES THEY BROUGHT THE BLUES TO ROCK & ROLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hillel Frankel
HILLEL FRANKEL THE ENTERTAINMENT LAW OFFICE, PC208 S LASALLE ST STE 1400CHICAGO, IL 60604-1251UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films about music and musicians; compact discs, DVDs, phonograph records, video tapes and video cassettes all featuring music and documentary style narration and live performances; digital media, namely, pre-recorded video recordings featuring music and biographies | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, Namely, Jackets, overcoats, sweaters, T-shirts, shirts, pants, caps, scarfs, belts, and shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Out The Box Records, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Out The Box Records, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WHITE, BLACK AND BLUES THEY BROUGHT THE BLUES TO ROCK & ROLL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2012 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |